TL;DR
Get oils, diffusers and self-care delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Anew is expanding in the United States with American-sourced spring water, U.S. bottle manufacturing and sales aimed at retail, hospitality, wellness and fitness businesses. The company has published laboratory reports on microplastics, selected PFAS compounds and bottle materials; the findings apply only to the samples and substances tested.
New Zealand-founded water brand Anew is expanding in the United States with American-sourced spring water in reusable, plant-based bottles and domestic bottle manufacturing, as it targets retail, hospitality, wellness and fitness customers. The company is also publishing laboratory reports on microplastics, selected PFAS compounds and bottle materials to support its product claims.
Anew says its U.S. spring water comes from a protected underground artesian aquifer and is bottled without reverse osmosis or artificial remineralization. The company describes its bottle and cap as plant-based and says the lightweight design is dishwasher-safe and intended for repeated refilling. It says U.S. bottle manufacturing began in October 2026.
For its microplastics testing, Anew says it sent a bottle through a journey designed to approximate shipping and storage before it reaches a customer. The bottle was filled in New Zealand, shipped by sea to Los Angeles without climate control, trucked to Las Vegas and stored for 2.5 months before being submitted to EMSL Analytical. EMSL’s report, dated May 5, 2025, found no microplastics in the single sample within the method’s detection limits. The analysis used microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, citing ISO 24187:2023 and other analytical guidance.
Anew has also published a water-testing report that found no detections among 14 PFAS compounds analyzed using EPA Method 537.1. A company-prepared summary of SGS testing reports no BPA or BPS detected in the bottle bodies tested. These findings concern the particular samples and substances examined; they do not establish that all Anew products are free of all contaminants or chemicals.
Testing Shapes Anew’s U.S. Pitch
Anew is entering a crowded bottled-water market by pairing reusable packaging with test documents that customers can review. That approach may appeal to buyers weighing packaging and water-quality claims, while giving retailers, hotels and fitness businesses material to consider when evaluating a new supplier. The reports also make the limits of the company’s claims relevant: each result is tied to a specific sample, test method and set of analytes.
The issue has wider public relevance because regulators and researchers are examining plastic particles in drinking water. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency added microplastics to its draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List in April 2026. The list identifies contaminants for consideration in future regulatory decisions; it does not set a federal drinking-water limit. Anew’s test is a company product test, not a regulatory determination or a broad survey of its supply.
The testing could help consumers judge the evidence behind Anew’s statements, but a negative result in one submitted sample cannot answer every question about exposure. The distinction matters for customers comparing products: a result within a method’s detection limits is not proof that particles or substances are absent in every bottle or below every possible detection threshold.
Products Worth Considering
Oral-B iO5 Rechargeable Electric Toothbrush with 5 Cleaning Modes and Travel Case, White
Withings BPM Connect Blood Pressure Monitor with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
Oral-B iO Series 3 Rechargeable Electric Toothbrush for Adults, Black, 3 Modes, 2 Brush Heads and Travel Case
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How Anew Built Its Testing Case
Anew’s U.S. rollout brings together three elements: a domestic water source, bottle production in the United States and a focus on laboratory documentation. The brand says it is pursuing distribution in retail, hospitality, wellness and fitness. It lists Bristol Farms, Lassens, HUME, Pop Up Grocer and The Shelf among its stockists, along with select hotels and Pilates studios; products are also available through its U.S. website.
The company’s founder, Jayden Klinac, said the microplastics test was designed to examine a bottle after shipping and storage rather than only a bottle at the production line. Anew’s stated route included sea freight, trucking and months in storage. The report, however, covers one submitted sample, so it does not establish results across different production runs, water sources or storage conditions.
Research cited in the original report provides broader context but is not directly comparable. A 2024 study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences reported an average of about 240,000 plastic particles per liter across samples from three bottled-water brands; roughly 90% were nanoplastics. The study used a different analytical technique. Anew’s microplastics test does not establish whether nanoplastics were present, so the two results should not be treated as a direct comparison.
What the Test Results Do Not Show
The microplastics finding is limited to one sample and the detection capabilities of the method used. The report does not establish that every bottle is free of microplastics, and it does not establish the absence of nanoplastics. Anew’s PFAS report covers 14 named compounds, not every PFAS, while the BPA and BPS summary concerns the bottle bodies tested.
The available material does not specify how many bottles or production batches were examined for the packaging tests, provide a full account of the company’s ongoing testing schedule, or establish whether independent testing will be repeated as U.S. production scales. It also does not state how widely the new water and bottles will be distributed beyond the named stockists and selected venues.
The EPA’s draft contaminant list is a step in considering future regulatory decisions, not a finding that Anew’s water or any other product violates a standard. The timing and outcome of any future federal action remain unsettled.
Distribution and Testing Ahead
Anew says it is pursuing U.S. distribution through retail, hospitality, wellness and fitness channels, with products available from its website and named stockists. Its stated domestic manufacturing start date is October 2026. The company has not provided a detailed schedule for additional store launches, manufacturing volumes or future testing in the source material.
Readers and prospective business partners can review the published reports for the specific methods and findings described. Further information about repeated testing, the number of samples covered and results from U.S.-made bottles would clarify how broadly the current findings apply as the rollout develops. Federal consideration of microplastics will proceed separately through the EPA’s contaminant review process.
Key Questions
What is Anew introducing in the United States?
Anew is introducing American-sourced spring water in reusable, plant-based bottles and says domestic bottle manufacturing began in October 2026. It is pursuing retail, hospitality, wellness and fitness distribution.
Did the laboratory find microplastics in Anew’s sample?
EMSL Analytical’s report dated May 5, 2025, found no microplastics in the single submitted sample within the method’s detection limits. That result does not establish that every bottle is free of microplastics.
Does the microplastics result cover nanoplastics?
No. The source says Anew’s test does not establish the absence of nanoplastics. The cited 2024 bottled-water study used a different analytical technique, so its results are not directly comparable with Anew’s test.
What do Anew’s PFAS and bottle-material reports say?
Anew’s water-testing report found no detections among 14 PFAS compounds analyzed using EPA Method 537.1. A company-prepared summary of SGS testing reports no BPA or BPS detected in the bottle bodies tested. Both statements are limited to the substances and samples examined.
Does the EPA list set a drinking-water limit for microplastics?
No. The EPA’s draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List identifies contaminants for consideration in future regulatory decisions. Its inclusion of microplastics does not establish a federal drinking-water limit.
Source: athletechnews.com
